Apr 23, 2026 10:19am IST
‘Michael’ Movie Review: Jaafar Jackson Moonwalks Into Your Heart With a Fitting Tribute to The King Of Pop
The best parts in this Michael Jackson biopic are the ones that aren’t about him. Yes, as strange as it might sound, there are multiple chapters that chronicle people around him which play out better than scenes written around the elusive pop star . His family, his manager, his bodyguard, his relationship with fans, and even a subtle dig at the musical genius Prince all find space here.
There are two ways to watch Michael. One is to relive the wave of nostalgia that hits you from the very first frame. The other is to watch it with an open mind, without expectations. But can anyone really watch an MJ biopic without expectations? That’s a tough call.
Related Stories
Directed by Antoine Fuqua, “Michael” is more a humble reminder of why the singer is still hailed as the King of Pop than an attempt to dig out facts or uncover uncomfortable truths. The film is a full-fledged celebration of who Michael was and what he means to his fans. Within the first hour, you realise just how timeless his music is and how unmatched his footwork and dance remain.
We meet the Jackson 5 early on. The year is 1966, and the patriarch Joseph is calling the shots, planning an ambition-filled future for his children. Some of the best moments belong to the young Michael, played effortlessly by Juliano Valdi. The film moves briskly, with its pace and timelines guided by MJ’s songs and chart-topping albums.
Your IMAX theatre turns into a party. You can’t help but tap your feet when “Billie Jean” and “Beat It” kick in, or feel emotional enough to light up your phone torch during “I’ll Be There.” What elevates these moments is the attention to detail in costume, hair, and makeup. Everything from the iconic diamond-studded glove to the sparkling white socks is recreated with finesse.
Performances are solid, with Jaafar leading from the front. Yes, he is MJ’s nephew, but that arguably makes the task even more challenging. In several scenes, it becomes difficult to tell whether it’s him or MJ performing those signature moves.
For those asking, “Where is the controversy?” or “Why aren’t the allegations explored?”, the makers hint at a follow-up sequel that may cover the later years of his life. Michael is largely celebratory, but it does not completely ignore the darker shades of his story. The toxic past and his strained relationship with his father are touched upon. The “belt treatment,” the racism he faced when mainstream networks refused to play his music videos, and the delayed recognition he received all add weight to the narrative. Peter Pan serves as a recurring metaphor, reminding us of a man who remained a child at heart, trapped in an adult’s world.
“Michael” isn’t a perfect film. It has flaws, much like the person it is based on. What it does offer is melody, rhythm, and an infectious sense of celebration. If you are an MJ fan, it promises a thoroughly enjoyable theatrical experience. And if you aren’t, you may just walk away discovering the discography of one of the greatest performers of all time. Let loose and enjoy this one. The follow-up might not be this indulgent.
Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.